There are currently 3 close votes on my question "How to produce simple 2D illustrations to accompany geometry answers?". One for Off-Topic, One for Too Broad, And One for Too Subjective.
This suggests to me that there are multiple problems I might address, but no clear relative priorities among them.
I imagine the "off-topic" voter might be satisfied with a migration to meta, as suggested in this related meta question.
"Too Subjective" could be addressed by stipulating that you must link to an actual post on the SE network where such an illustration was in fact used to assist a mathy explanation <-- an objective criterion. This would disqualify the Powerpoint answer.
"Too Broad" kinda cuts to the heart, I fear. The initial revision was clearly "too narrow". Is there a middle-ground to be struck?